How long prokaryotes populated the earth

To check whether our estimates are affected by this caveat, we also used a variant of iChao2 "iChao2split" , whereby we randomly assigned studies to four complementary and equally sized groups and considered each group as a single independent global sampling unit.

Hence, iChao2split considered the number of OTUs found in only one study group Q 1 , in exactly two study groups Q 2 , in three study groups Q 3 , and in all four study groups Q 4. The splitting was randomly repeated times, and the obtained estimates were averaged Fig 1E ; the standard error was set to the standard deviation of estimates across repeated splittings. We mention that analogous estimators exist e. Such abundance-based estimators are not suited for our data set for two reasons: first, to obtain a single globally ranging reference sample, we would need to pool all GPC samples so as to obtain a measure of abundance for the various OTUs.

However, read counts from separate amplicon-sequencing samples cannot be combined to obtain a measure of global OTU abundances since the total number of cells that was present in each sample is unknown and sequencing depths varied between samples. Second, typical abundance-based estimators such as iChao1 rely on knowing the number of singleton OTUs i. Note that this filter corresponds to increasing the OTU detection threshold in each study, just as sequencing depth affects detection thresholds.

Since the incidence-based richness estimators used in this study all account for finite a priori unknown and potentially variable detection probabilities, their applicability is not expected to be substantially compromised by a systematic application of this filter.

This is roughly analogous to performing a mark-recapture—based assessment of wildlife population size; a systematic decrease of capturing effort may increase the variance of the resulting estimate, but it will not affect the expected value of that estimate. Using the fact that the total estimated probability of hitting an OTU with zero reads in the GPC P 0 is not greater than P 1 it is more probable to rehit some OTU with one read than to hit some OTU with zero reads and the fact that , we obtain the lower bound.

An overview of computed probabilities for various clustering thresholds is given in S7 Table. We note that the Good—Turing frequency estimator is widely used in biological statistics and has been repeatedly shown to be more robust than simply using the fraction of assigned reads [ , ]. We emphasize that we calculated MRAs separately for each sample, even though MRAs from shallower sequenced samples may be less accurate.

This approach was preferred over the alternative of simply calculating the fraction of reads assigned to an OTU when all samples are pooled because samples differ drastically in sequencing depth; thus, OTUs that happen to occur in deeply sequenced samples would appear to be more abundant than OTUs in shallowly sequenced samples. Similarly, pooling within studies was also avoided because sequencing depth varied widely even among samples of the same study, and samples were usually not technical replicates; hence, MRAs calculated for a given study after pooling would be biased toward organisms that happened to be present in deeply sequenced samples.

By calculating MRAs separately for each sample prior to averaging, we avoid biases toward OTUs in more deeply sequenced samples. We note that the resulting frequency histogram should not be interpreted as a true OTU abundance distribution because it only includes OTUs discovered by the GPC and may thus be artificially positively skewed [ ].

We randomly removed half of the quality- and chimera-filtered reads and repeated the OTU clustering and analyses described above, thus obtaining a rarefied variant of the GPC rGPC. Specifically, we assumed that the number of reads assigned to an OTU in any given MRA interval was Poisson-distributed and that the probability of being discovered was given by the probability of being matched by at least two reads, i.

Fitting was performed via least-squares. The fitted log-normal model was integrated over the entire real axis to obtain an estimate for the total number of extant prokaryotic OTUs. Only samples with publicly accessioned latitude and longitude information are shown 25, samples in A; 4, samples in B. Frequency histograms of the number of samples top row and the number of studies bottom row in which each GPC OTU was found in for bacteria left column and archaea right column.

In A and B, the left-most bar refers to a number of samples equal to two. Error bars indicate standard errors, estimated from the underlying models; most standard errors are likely underestimated by the models, so the variability between models is probably a more honest assessment of uncertainty.

Only phyla including at least 10 entries in SILVA release , set NR99 and estimated to contain at least 10 extant clusters are shown. Only classes including at least 10 entries in SILVA release , set NR99 and estimated to contain at least 10 extant clusters are shown. Only a subset of studies were used in this analysis subset "AG".

Figures A and B contain the same information, shown in alternative ways. Note that the horizontal axis shows similarities in A and distances in B. Also see S15 Fig for a comparison with exact amplicon sequence variants. Clusters were generated from a subset of studies subset "AG".

The last row lists the number of clusters discovered by the GPC. NA indicates that the estimator did not converge. Number of 16S sequence clusters in the GPC with exactly two reads N 2 and probability that a single additional amplicon sequence would hit a GPC cluster P , estimated using the Good—Turing frequency formula, see Methods for details for various clustering similarities.

Abstract The global diversity of Bacteria and Archaea, the most ancient and most widespread forms of life on Earth, is a subject of intense controversy. Author summary The global diversity of Bacteria and Archaea "prokaryotes" , the most ancient and most widespread forms of life on Earth, is subject to high uncertainty.

Introduction Microorganisms are the most ancient and the most widespread form of life on Earth, inhabiting virtually every ecosystem and driving the bulk of global biogeochemical cycles. Results and discussion The GPC covers the bulk of global 16S diversity To ensure maximal phylogenetic coverage, the raw sequencing data from each study was considered as input to our analyses.

Download: PPT. Eliminating potential caveats While our statistical richness estimators Fig 1C and 1D were designed to account for variable detection probabilities among OTUs, the potential risk of neglecting a large number of extremely rare OTUs cannot be overemphasized. Fig 2. Most prokaryotic OTUs are globally distributed When we repeated our analyses using only studies from the Americas or near American coasts studies across 14 countries, see map in S1 Fig instead of the full GPC, OTU discovery rates for any given number of studies remained almost unchanged Fig 1A and 1B.

Taxon-specific diversities and coverages in databases Our census allows an unprecedentedly precise assessment of the diversity covered by existing 16S databases such as SILVA [ 14 ] or the RDP [ 12 ].

Implications Our work suggests that global prokaryotic OTU richness is about six orders of magnitude lower than previously predicted via extrapolation of diversity scaling laws and OTU abundance distributions fitted to individual microbial communities [ 6 , 8 ]. Conclusions In , Curtis and colleagues [ 2 ] hypothesized that experimental approaches to directly enumerating extant prokaryotic diversity will remain fruitless due to logistical challenges.

Amplicon sequence clustering Paired-end reads with sufficient overlap were merged using flash v1. Accumulation curves Accumulation curves of OTUs discovered, as a function of studies included, were calculated as follows. Estimating global OTU richness based on incidence frequencies To estimate the total number of OTUs globally using the statistical estimators described in the main text iChao2, ICE, CatchAll, breakaway, tWLRM , we considered each study as an independent sampling unit and counted the number of OTUs found in exactly one sampling unit Q 1 , in exactly two sampling units Q 2 , and so on.

Supporting information. S1 Data. Sample summary and accession numbers. S2 Data. OTU incidence frequency tables. OTU, operational taxonomic unit. S3 Data. Sample summary and accession numbers for AG subset. S1 Text. The pitfalls of extrapolating host-specific microbial diversity estimates.

S2 Text. An upper bound for the number of extant OTUs at steady state. S1 Fig. Sample locations. S2 Fig. Samples and studies per OTU. S3 Fig. S4 Fig. S5 Fig. Prokaryotic richness estimates Americas versus globally. S6 Fig. S7 Fig. S8 Fig. S9 Fig. S10 Fig. S11 Fig. S12 Fig. S13 Fig. S14 Fig. S15 Fig. S1 Table. Estimated numbers of extant prokaryotic 16S clusters worldwide.

S2 Table. S3 Table. S4 Table. S5 Table. S6 Table. S7 Table. References 1. Dykhuizen DE. Santa Rosalia revisited: why are there so many species of bacteria? Antonie Leeuwenhoek. Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean?

PLoS Biol. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol. Status of the Archaeal and Bacterial Census: an Update. Scaling laws predict global microbial diversity.

Amann R, Rossello-Mora R. View Article Google Scholar 8. Reply to Willis: Powerful predictions of biodiversity from ecological models and scaling laws. Inordinate fondness multiplied and redistributed: the number of species on Earth and the new pie of life.

Q Rev Biol. View Article Google Scholar Stadler T. On incomplete sampling under birth—death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent. J Theor Biol. A macroecological theory of microbial biodiversity. Nat Ecol Evol. Nucleic Acids Res. Synthesis of phylogeny and taxonomy into a comprehensive tree of life. J Biotechnol. Bacterial diversification through geological time.

The underestimation of global microbial diversity. The vast unknown microbial biosphere. Shade A. Diversity is the question, not the answer. ISME J. Where less may be more: how the rare biosphere pulls ecosystems strings.

Microbial diversity knows no borders. Nat Rev Microb. Willis A. Extrapolating abundance curves has no predictive power for estimating microbial biodiversity. A communal catalogue reveals Earth's multiscale microbial diversity. The effect of primer choice and short read sequences on the outcome of 16S rRNA gene based diversity studies. Sensitivity and correlation of hypervariable regions in 16S rRNA genes in phylogenetic analysis.

BMC Bioinformatics. Dykhuizen D. Species numbers in bacteria. Proc Calif Acad Sci. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today.

Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol.

Edgar RC. Jaspers E, Overmann J. Ecological significance of microdiversity: Identical 16S rRNA gene sequences can be found in bacteria with highly divergent genomes and ecophysiologies. Appl Environ Microbiol. Ordering microbial diversity into ecologically and genetically cohesive units. Trends Microbiol. The bacterial species challenge: making sense of genetic and ecological diversity.

Schleifer KH. Classification of Bacteria and Archaea: Past, present and future. Syst Appl Microbiol. Bobay LM, Ochman H. Biological species are universal across Life's domains. Genome Biol Evol. Reeder J, Knight R. The 'rare biosphere': a reality check. Nat Meth. Sample richness and genetic diversity as drivers of chimera formation in nSSU metagenetic analyses. As already seen, the ruminants cattle, sheep, deer, camels, etc. Termites use a similar arrangement and many insects and marine animals also depend on the metabolic versatility of symbiotic prokaryotes.

A large proportion of all other animals which have no such special capacities are dependent on prokaryotic teams in their alimentary tract, without which they cannot live normally. Experimentally obtained germfree animals may present serious often deadly health problems during their abnormal life.

The prokaryotic teams of all normal alimentary tracts exert a favorable influence, often a necessary one for the well-being and survival of animals Raibaud and Ducluzeau, Many successful symbioses are also known between fungi and prokaryotes Kendrick, In the course of their evolution prokaryotes have built genetic variation by countless synthesis of new genes covering practically all the possible ways of unicellular life on our planet. Thereafter, redistribution of the genes from that pool to different strains has led to a giant common global genome for all prokaryotes.

The potentialities of this genome, as we mentioned, is also made partially accessible to eukaiyotes through associations and symbioses. Prokaryotes have been determinant in the evolution of all beings on our planet. Many eukaryotes survived and prospered because of associations with them. It has evolved as a balanced, life-supportive, global entity which had, without other biological interference, a very long stretch of time to organize itself by trial and error, constantly correcting and adjusting by positive competition.

During their long solitary evolution, the prokaryotes have succeeded in reaching a much greater variety of metabolic and energetic capacities which offered them wider opportunities in a large choice of niches. The variety and richness of biochemical reactions and pathways in prokaryotes explain the abundance and success of the successive genetic innovations realized in eukaryotes following a variety of symbioses with complementary prokaryotes. Moreover, all along their 3. The genes and strains that became lost and extinct during that period were probably few.

When eukaryotes appeared as predator cells they started the Darwinian type of evolution at the cost of successive extinctions of different types, as a result of fierce competition. However, in parallel, innovative genetic improvements happened, presumably in most surviving eukaryotes through the agency of symbioses with complementing prokaryotic strains.

By allowing this rich collection of genes and strains to adjust and survive instead of becoming extinct, the prokaryotic System has accumulated and still keeps available for symbiotic associations a huge amount of hereditary information. It has also contributed to accelerate the speed of eukaryotic changes. In considering the development of our rich biosphere and the maintenance of its stability one must not forget two different and very important moments of prokaryotic evolution.

The first was preparatory, built up stability, and was a purely prokaryotic episode. Collaboration, in a parallel non-Darwinian fashion, between the two domains the prokaryotic global System and the eukaryotes helped diversify, enrich and stabilize our present-day biosphere. Check if your institution has already acquired this book: authentification to OpenEdition Freemium for Books.

You can suggest to your institution to acquire one or more ebooks published on OpenEdition Books. Do not hesitate to give them our contact information: OpenEdition - Freemium Department access openedition. C - F Marseille You can also fill in the form below with, which will enable us to forward your librarians your suggestion of acquisition.

Thank you. We will forward your request to your library as soon as possible. OpenEdition is a web platform for electronic publishing and academic communication in the humanities and social sciences. Desktop version Mobile version. Prokaryotology Chapter III. Original, non-Darwin Chapter II. Major characteristics of the prokaryotic world.

Prokaryotology Sorin Sonea. Search inside the book. Table of contents. Cite Share. Cited by. Chapter III. Original, non-Darwinian evolution of prokaryotes p. Full text. Ways in which errors in the division of the earliest cells could be prevented or compensated for 2 It is likely that multiplication by binary fission of the first ancestral cells did not always result in their perfect partitioning into two identical descendants. Variety and diversification inside the early global prokaryotic clone 4 As millions of years went by, the prokaryotic cells slowly began to accumulate in their population an increasing number of entirely new, successful genes resulting from successive random mutations.

Prokaryotic cells evolved and progressed together towards both high specialization and easy complementarity 5 The prokaryotic way of evolution made the diversity of the cells increase progressively toward reciprocal support, to the point that eventually there was less and less similarity between the bio-energetic reactions of different strains. The appearance of the bacterial cell wall and of transformation 9 Because of the almost certainly rigorous environmental conditions that prevailed and the fragile nature of the cell membrane, practically all prokaryotes ended up with genes for the synthesis of a stronger, protective supplementary envelope called the cell wall of which there are now only a few different basic types.

Small replicons became the most efficient basic elements of a prokaryotic global communication System 10 The small replicons appeared, presumably, before the branching into Archaea and Eubacteria, since they are present in both groups. The global prokaryotic superorganism or biologic System as a unique type of clonal entity; there are no prokaryotic species 11 Generally, the most complex entities displaying the highest capacities seem to be the clones which contain specialized cells practicing a well adapted division of labor to fulfill superior fonctions.

Role of prokaryotes in the origin and subsequent evolution of eukaryotes 12 Eubacteria and Archaea are not the only offsprings of the ancestor prokaryotes. The prokaryotes were and remain the most influential biological factor in the development and maintenance of our biosphere 13 The biosphere may be much better understood when the primordial and central role of the all pervading and stable prokaryotic world is given its true importance.

This digital publication is the result of automatic optical character recognition. Read Open Access. Freemium Recommend to your library for acquisition. Buy Print version leslibraires. ISBN: Sonea, S. Original, non-Darwinian evolution of prokaryotes. Sonea, Sorin. Prokaryotology: A Coherent Point of View. By Sonea. New edition [online]. Size: small x px Medium x px Large x px.

Catalogue Author s Publishers Selections Excerpts. In All OpenEdition. All OpenEdition. This gave the host cell the ability to use oxygen to release energy stored in nutrients. Several lines of evidence support that mitochondria are derived from this endosymbiotic event. Mitochondria are shaped like a specific group of bacteria and are surrounded by two membranes, which would result when one membrane-bound organism was engulfed by another membrane-bound organism.

The mitochondrial inner membrane involves substantial infoldings or cristae that resemble the textured outer surface of certain bacteria. Mitochondria divide on their own by a process that resembles binary fission in prokaryotes. Mitochondria have their own circular DNA chromosome that carries genes similar to those expressed by bacteria.

Mitochondria also have special ribosomes and transfer RNAs that resemble these components in prokaryotes. These features all support that mitochondria were once free-living prokaryotes. Chloroplasts are one type of plastid , a group of related organelles in plant cells that are involved in the storage of starches, fats, proteins, and pigments. Chloroplasts contain the green pigment chlorophyll and play a role in photosynthesis.

Genetic and morphological studies suggest that plastids evolved from the endosymbiosis of an ancestral cell that engulfed a photosynthetic cyanobacterium. Plastids are similar in size and shape to cyanobacteria and are enveloped by two or more membranes, corresponding to the inner and outer membranes of cyanobacteria.

Like mitochondria, plastids also contain circular genomes and divide by a process reminiscent of prokaryotic cell division. The chloroplasts of red and green algae exhibit DNA sequences that are closely related to photosynthetic cyanobacteria, suggesting that red and green algae are direct descendants of this endosymbiotic event.

Mitochondria likely evolved before plastids because all eukaryotes have either functional mitochondria or mitochondria-like organelles. In contrast, plastids are only found in a subset of eukaryotes, such as terrestrial plants and algae.

One hypothesis of the evolutionary steps leading to the first eukaryote is summarized in [Figure 2]. The exact steps leading to the first eukaryotic cell can only be hypothesized, and some controversy exists regarding which events actually took place and in what order. Spirochete bacteria have been hypothesized to have given rise to microtubules, and a flagellated prokaryote may have contributed the raw materials for eukaryotic flagella and cilia.